1- How did the referees start the 2022-23 season in the Super League? Did the overall performance look good in the first week? Were those on the field or VAR more successful?
FIRAT AYDINUS: EXCEPT ONE MATCH, ALL THE GAMES WERE GOOD
We can say that the overall performance is successful. Considering the limited staff, I found the success of the referees in VAR much better than those on the field, except for one match. The beginning of the season is difficult for the referees, just like the teams. Physical and mental preparation, followed by MHK When we say seminar, an intense process is entered. Uncertainty of MHK and classifications is also a source of stress for referees.
MURAT FEVZI TANIRLI: ISTANBUL-TRABZON WAS LIKE THE PREMIER LEAGUE
The overall picture was successful. Bahattin Şimşek, Volkan Bayarslan and Ali Şansalan became prominent names. Arda Kardesler was also good in the opening match between Istanbulspor and Trabzonspor, but there was not even a position to force the referee in the match. It ended with 13-11 fouls at Premier League level. In the big 3 matches, there were many controversial positions, but apart from a few mistakes, it was correct with VAR interventions.
class=”medianet-inline-adv”>
2- The VAR staff left and 11 referees were included in the VAR staff. If we take into account the Turkish Cup, can this number be enough to take the whole season?
FIRAT AYDIUNS: IF THERE IS NO REINFORCEMENT FOR THE VAR, THE CRISIS WILL GO
If the season will progress with a limited number, it is obvious that he is pregnant with big handicaps. In the following weeks, it may even be possible to assign 2 or more tasks to the same referee in a week. What I mean will be better understood in terms of the tasks to be given and the performance status. World CupThe break to be given is a great opportunity. In the meantime, reinforcements and training should be made to the VAR staff. Even the use of assistant referees in the AVAR squad should be reviewed for the interpretation of critical offside positions, as seen from the first week.
MURAT FEVZİ TANIRLI: SOME OF THESE REGRET THE FEE
In the first week, 11 referees in the VAR staff alternated between VAR and AVAR. Because 18 seats were needed in 9 games. There is no VAR structure in any country that is staffed independently from the field, we are a first in the world. As the weeks progress, staff management can lead to a crisis in possible problems. Some names may have to play 3 games in the same week, while those who are punished and have health problems. Mentally distressed. Among those who did not accept the VAR invitation of the MHK, there were those who regretted seeing the salaries and wages. They may be looking forward to the classifications at the World Cup!
class=”medianet-inline-adv”>
3- What did the appointments of MHK in the first week of the Super League make you think about March 8? Do the effects of the March 8 operation still continue or is it over?
FIRAT AYDINUS: 8 MARCH VICTIMS ATTEND IN 2 MATCHES
When MHK President Sabri Celik took office 5 weeks before the end of last season, only 11 of 50 matches were given to the victims on 8 March. In the first week of this season, 2 of 9 games were assigned to the victims of March 8 (Ali Palabıyık, Bahattin Şimşek). The season will have to progress in order to be able to make a sound judgment on this issue, to say “Yes, the 8 March separation is over” or “The appointments were not blind”.
class=”medianet-inline-adv”>
MURAT FEVZİ TANIRLI: WHO WILL WIN SOON
TFF When these questions were asked to President Mehmet Büyükekşi, he replied, “We respect the arbitration authority of football, there is no such distinction for us”. When we asked the President of the MHK and its members, we got the answer “We are working as if we are back to March 7”. We are following. Will those who try to remove the names who have served the community for years will win or whether justice will be determined.
4- In the first week, we did not see the general aggressive and tense attitude of the managers and football players on the pitch and in front of the microphones at the end of the match…
FIRAT AYDINUS: WE MUST WAIT FOR CLEAR ANSWERS
For a clear answer to this question, it is necessary to wait for the later times of the season. The answer to this question cannot be given at the moment in a tough league such as the Super League, where competition is at a high level. But rest assured that we will definitely get the answer to this critical question very soon.
class=”medianet-inline-adv”>
MURAT FEVZİ TANIRLI: IMAGINE OR REALITY WE’LL SEE SOON
TFF President Mehmet Büyükekşi insistently repeated the words “Fair-Play” and “Trust” in every statement. He told the referees that there would be sanctions for possible attacks. Even if it is early, my curiosity is whether such explanations have had an effect or will we see rosy dreams.
5- Cüneyt Çakır, who had a contract for one more year, suddenly switched to education. Did such a request come from TFF 5 or why did he want to quit? How should it be interpreted?
FIRAT AYDINUS: CAKIR’S REASON FOR LEAVE MUST BE EXPLAINED
An explanation must come from MHK. Is it really a decision taken by Çakır or a decision taken? Çakır attended the Super League pre-season seminar, then went to the UEFA seminar. Also, Champions League Managed the match in the qualifier. His return to refereeing has many question marks in terms of timing and what he did before the season. If such a decision is taken in parallel with the contract, not only trainer but also MHK Consultancy will be suitable as a duty.
class=”medianet-inline-adv”>
MURAT FEVZİ TANIRLI: HE CANNOT TEACH WITH SUCH A CAREER
Except for the unexpected decision, I don’t think such a career will continue with only teaching in the lower leagues. I asked TFF Secretary General Kadir Kardaş about this issue, and he stated that they had no prior knowledge of Çakır’s decision. Although, the TFF claimed that March 8 was made without their knowledge(!). Çakır’s participation in the UEFA seminar may be a request to the UEFA Referees Committee officials to share their plans for the future.
MURAT FEVZİ TANIRLI: THE DIALOGUES BETWEEN THE REFEREE AND THE ‘AVAILABLE’ ROOM ARE AT MINIMUM LEVEL
VAR interventions in the first week of the Super League were at the level of UEFA standards. We learned from many referees and assistants that the VAR room is sensitive to never go out of protocol. In this way, unnecessary dialogs that will confuse positions are eliminated or reduced. When there is no intervention from the VAR in the positions where the referees are hesitant, they get a quick reaction on the field by saying “The job is done”. They know that the slightest out-of-protocol sign, cough, etc. will not come from VAR.
THE ‘TURKISH JOB IS OVER’ LIKE IT’S GOING TO DONE
The point that draws attention in the first week is that the referees who blow the whistle show the card directly, without waiting, if the position requires a card according to their own interpretation. In fact, a referee said, “Brother, for God’s sake, will you not talk at all?” He shared his instant reaction to VAR. To sum up, “Turkish job YES” seems to be over. In this way, referees who do not adapt to the protocol perform better.
YES, ADDICTIVE TO REFEREES
At UEFA, too, inspections were increased as the availability of VAR was found to go so far as to create dependency on referees. The rate of bold decision making increased as studies and trainings were carried out to ensure that no signals were received by the referees.
COUNCIL NOTE: VIOLATIONS MADE ON THE LINE ARE CONSIDERED TO BE MADE WITHIN THE PENALTY AREA
The penalty that the visiting team won in the F.Bahçe-Ümraniyespor match was much discussed. Comments were made on whether the position was inside or outside the penalty area. Let’s make one point clear as a council; Peres’ first attack on his opponent is outside. The referee does not blow the whistle at that time.
PERES INTERVENED TWICE
In the continuation of the position, Peres commits another violation by hitting again while the opposing player’s foot is on the penalty area line, and the referee blows his whistle. In the game rules, lines are included in the area they limit. That is, violations made on the lines surrounding the penalty area are considered as if they were committed inside the penalty area. So the decision in the position is a penalty
How is disciplinary action applied in such positions?
· If the referee had fouled the first position outside the penalty area: There would have been an obvious goal-scoring chance and a red card.
· Foul on the position above the penalty area line: Penalty and yellow card.
.