ECHR assertion from Fenerbahçe! Compromise has been reached

/ sport / By

Fenerbahce acknowledged that two completely different purposes had been made to the European Courtroom of Human Rights (ECHR) concerning the sentences assigned to President Ali Koç and former supervisor Alper Pirşen by the Turkish Soccer Federation (TFF).

The assertion made by the yellow-dark blue individuals is as follows:

“On account of the evaluations made by the Skilled Soccer Disciplinary Committee of the Turkish Soccer Federation on 18.6.2020, a variety of penalties had been decided on the grounds that unsportsmanlike statements had been made about our Membership and our President, Mr. Ali Koç, and these penalties had been authorised by the Arbitration Board on 19.6.2020 regardless of the objections made by our Membership.

Equally, the TFF Arbitration Board authorised the choice of PFDK on 03.12.2020 on the dedication of comparable penalties for Mr. Alper Pirşen, who was a Member of the Board of Administrators at the moment, on 10.12.2020.

With each of its choices, the related Board violated the liberty of expression, which is assured by the twenty sixth article of the Turkish Structure, in addition to the sixth article of the European Conference on Human Rights, which ensures the proper to a good trial, and the tenth article, which ensures the liberty of expression. .

As it’s identified, the choices of the Board of Arbitration concerning the self-discipline of sports activities are last, and Article 59/3 of the Turkish Structure states that “Solely obligatory arbitration may be utilized in opposition to the choices of sports activities federations concerning the administration and self-discipline of sports activities actions. The selections of the arbitration board are last and no judicial motion shall be taken in opposition to these choices. can’t be appealed to.” In accordance with the supply, it’s closed to purposes which may be topic to objection in any means earlier than the TR Courts and the Turkish Constitutional Courtroom. On this path, as acknowledged above, since there is no such thing as a judicial treatment in our nation, the European Courtroom of Human Rights (ECtHR) for the sentences assigned to our Membership, our President, Mr. Ali Koç and our former supervisor, Mr. Two completely different purposes had been made earlier than him.

The ECtHR purposes in query; Because it has been repeatedly acknowledged by our membership earlier than, it has turn into a necessity because of the unjust TFF practices prior to now, the TFF boards which are open to dialogue that they’re unbiased and neutral, and the grievances which have arisen attributable to their choices aimed toward intimidation.

As part of the ECtHR processes, inside the scope of the strange process of the ECtHR proceedings concerning each of our purposes, upon the invitation of the events to reconciliation inside the framework of the litigious proceedings with out continuing to the contentious trial; The Republic of Turkey has accepted that Articles 6 and 10 of the European Conference on Human Rights have been violated inside the scope of each information and has dedicated to cowl each measurable damages (comparable to PFDK fines), each immeasurable damages and bills incurred through the trial.

In step with the opinions of our Board of Administrators, which has been following the problem with nice sensitivity from the very starting, our Membership has lastly accepted reconciliation in each circumstances.

With regard to each of the aforementioned purposes, it was ensured that the dispute was dismissed and concluded earlier than the trial earlier than the judges earlier than the ECtHR. Thus, this controversial state of affairs is completely different from the Sedat Doğan v. Turkey choice of 18 Might 2021, which was beforehand established earlier than the ECtHR concerning our nation, the Ali Rıza and Others v. Turkey choice of 28 January 2020, and different examples; It has been resolved by consensus earlier than the choices concerning the violation had been established.

As a matter of truth, earlier than our membership’s purposes to the ECtHR are concluded;

It is usually identified to the general public that the TFF has made some updates and adjustments in its directions and rules concerning the reasoned choices, the election ideas of the boards, and the necessity to observe basic rights and freedoms, particularly freedom of expression.

As may be seen from our statements above, our want is; The reconciliation reached because of our purposes will result in ends in a means that won’t trigger any materials or ethical injury to our Membership, different golf equipment or the stakeholders of the soccer world, or our State as soon as once more attributable to TFF practices. Primarily based on the stated settlement; We wish to emphasize that we count on the present and future TFF Administrations and Boards to keep away from subjective, illegal attitudes and choices that may hurt the dear perspective and can of our State.

On this event, we wish to specific our honest thanks as soon as once more to the State of the Republic of Turkey, which has given the strongest message to the sports activities neighborhood by bringing a good and fast resolution to the problem.

Fenerbahçe Sports activities Membership has pioneered and served the nation’s sports activities in lots of olympic sports activities branches, particularly soccer, for 115 years since its institution and for 100 years for the reason that institution of the Republic of Turkey, and likewise stood by its nation and state in each state of affairs and situation, and its pursuits and well-being and labored for the union.

Our work according to these ideas and objectives will proceed without end.”


#ECHR #assertion #Fenerbahçe #Compromise #reached