BesiktasIn right now’s listening to of the case on the Bakırköy twelfth Excessive Prison Courtroom relating to the homicide of Şafak Mahmutyazıcıoğlu, the previous supervisor of . The attorneys of the events and Mahmutyazıcıoğlu’s elder brother Celal Mahmutyazıcıoğlu have been current within the courtroom. On the listening to, the place Ece Erken gave her assertion, the witnesses have been heard.
“WHEN SOMEONE WAS SHOOTING SAFAK, SOMEONE WAS SHOOTING”
Mahmutyazıcıoğlu’s buddy Ümit Onat, who was there on the time of the homicide, mentioned, “I noticed Şafak Mahmutyazıcıoğlu and Fikret Orman on the night of the incident, I sat subsequent to them. Later, Fikret Orman left. After some time, my pals got here and I sat at one other desk. Then two folks got here, Şafak and I. They wished to fulfill. I do not know for a way lengthy. I heard a gunshot. Şafak was crawling on her knees in the direction of my desk. It was apparent that she had been shot. They pulled Şafak. Whereas I used to be filming “After some time, they went away, I instantly ran to Şafak. I checked if there was a bullet exit from the again from the entrance. Then we took him to the hospital. There was a state of affairs the place Şafak was taking pictures furiously. That is my opinion. It is a transfer to guard her from bullets.” He by no means cursed when Daybreak was on the bottom. He did not even must act, not to mention speak,” he mentioned.
class=”medianet-inline-adv”>
“THE EVENT HAS OCCURRED DUE TO LEAD LEAD”
Regardless of the witness assertion, the defendant Ali Yasak mentioned, “I shot it to guard the sufferer. If I had the intention to kill, I’d have shot him within the head. I mentioned to my brother, ‘Sufficient, that is sufficient. What might I do to a person who could not even transfer? It occurred. How are you going to anticipate me to shoot the sufferer there. Do you drag an individual on the bottom once you need them to die? The incident occurred a couple of minutes after I entered the place. After I arrived, the sufferer was swearing. Whereas I used to be dragging him, I grabbed him by his sweater, tried to drag him away. ought to I’ve dropped it?” he mentioned.
class=”medianet-inline-adv”>
“NO ALCOHOL WAS TAKE AT THAT TABLE”
One other witness, the buddy of the deceased Mahmutyazıcıoğlu, Serkan Yazıcıoğlu, mentioned, “We met with Şafak that day. food We met for Then 2 folks got here to our desk. Şafak mentioned, ‘I do know them, they aren’t strangers’. They wished to sit down on the desk. Daybreak mentioned, ‘You go to the again desk, I am coming’. Then one thing occurred, somebody on the aspect mentioned, ‘Get down, bro.’ I additionally slept on the bottom. Daybreak was shot after I acquired up. There was additionally a journalist buddy named Fatih Doğan on the desk. Since Şafak knew these folks, I did not take note of what they have been speaking about. We have been really going to stand up earlier, however when Şafak mentioned, ‘Sit down a bit of longer,’ we sat down. No alcohol was taken at that desk. Şafak didn’t drink alcohol in order that it could not be a disgrace for us as a result of we didn’t drink alcohol. I didn’t see the occasions as a result of I used to be below the desk. I do not keep in mind any of the defendants right here. By the point I acquired out from below the desk, it was over,” he mentioned.
Ece Erken couldn’t management her tears infrequently throughout the listening to of the witnesses.
class=”medianet-inline-adv”>
DECISION TO FORCED EREN SERENGİL
The court docket board continues the detention of the detained defendants, Seren SerengilHe adjourned the listening to by deciding that Fikret Orman’s request to be heard as a witness was denied.
Ece Early In his assertion, “Rober Güler informed me that my spouse met with these folks and was threatened by these folks. Later, Fatih Sipahi known as a buddy of mine and mentioned, ‘I want to speak to Ece, I’ll give her crucial data. I’ll give details about her life.’ He mentioned that the incident was deliberate and deliberate. When these folks noticed Şafak in Cunda, they went and acquired weapons after which killed him. I known as the commissioner from the organized department after this dialog. Seren Serengil can be a witness to this speech,” he mentioned. Due to this assertion, the court docket determined to listen to Serengil as a witness. Ece Erken’s lawyer requested that Fikret Orman be heard as a witness. Fikret Orman, who was with Mahmutyazıcıoğlu on the day of the incident, was requested to be heard as a witness and to ask whether or not the sufferer was drunk.
class=”medianet-inline-adv”>
FROM THE CLAIM
Within the indictment ready by the Bakırköy Chief Public Prosecutor’s Workplace, the incident was reported as follows: “An condominium registered within the title of Ahmet Yosunlu in Bakırköy was transferred to the defendant Kerem Öztürk, who was the actual property agent for its sale. Whereas Öztürk was in search of a buyer to promote this condominium, the complainant Suphi, who lived on the highest ground of the condominium, Agreed with Malgaz to discover a buyer for the flat. Suphi Malgaz informed Kerem Öztürk that he has a buddy who will purchase the flat for 1 million 450 thousand TL. By promoting the flat for 1 million 650 thousand TL, Malgaz acquired a fee of 170 thousand TL from the client. After Öztürk and Gökhan Karakan discovered of this example, he informed Malgaz that he needed to pay this quantity to them. When the events couldn’t attain an settlement, the accused Gökhan Karakan threatened to have Malgaz killed. Gökhan Karakan reached the accused Seccad Yeşil and requested him to gather the cash in query. Yeşil defined the state of affairs to his buddy, the accused Kadir Yasak. Ban supplied to fulfill with Suphi Malgaz. within the accompanying assembly, Safak Mahmutyazicioglu He got here with Suphi Malgaz. Resulting from Mahmutyazıcıoğlu’s assist for Malgaz, Kadir Yasak and Seccad Yeşil couldn’t obtain the cash in query. For that reason, the defendants Kadir Yasak and Seccad Yeşil dedicated the homicide on January 27 by concentrating on the deceased Şafak Mahmutyazıcıoğlu.” For the defendants, Kadir Yasak, Seccad Yeşil, Serkan Dakman, Fatih Okan Kodak, Burak Otçuoğlu and Uğurcan Bilge, aggravated life imprisonment for 3 completely different crimes and a complete of three years 9 months to 10 years and 6 months in jail. It was requested that the defendants Gökhan Karakan and Kerem Öztürk be sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment for 3 completely different crimes and a complete of three years 9 months to 10 years and 6 months in jail. jail sentence was requested.
.