Atalay Girgin, Along with the disclosures that Sedat Peker has started recently, he wrote that the issue extended to the Ministry of National Education and to Nesrin Kakırman, who served as the Burdur Provincial Director of National Education.
While conveying the question marks regarding the declaration of property, Girgin also said, “There was no explanation on the subject.Is the promise that silence comes from confession once again confirmed from the top to the bottom?‘ he commented.
Girgin wrote:
“With every statement he makes on social media, he is on the agenda and sets the agenda. Sedat PekerAlong with the past, as well as his recent striking and scandalous posts, he finally caught up with the big and small intra-order opposition. At the end of about a year and a half, he started running to the prosecutor’s office, receiving his petition.
POLE STAR OF THE REGULAR OPPOSITION
Although this is not our main article, I should not pass without mentioning this: The opposition within the order, which wanted to fortify this structure, which was imprisoned within the borders of political consciousness of the order and which had turned into a swamp with all its institutions in the spiral of social disintegration, cultural-moral decay from the executive to the legislature and the judiciary, found its unofficial de facto leader.
In other words, Sedat Peker became the pole star of the intra-establishment opposition. At this point, it is not a prophecy to say without comment: Whether the opposition wins or loses a possible election depends on Sedat Peker.
And yet, while the power of the order and the extent of its opposition are evident, you are doomed to this order and you have no escape from this order!
What “A New Social Construction Project“There is no possibility of the destruction of this order… There is only the possibility of fortification of an order based on the exploitation of man by man, which dissolves, collapses, decays and degenerates into a pile of rubble or even a swamp. It’s just a possibility for now…
PEKER REACHES TO MEB
In short, Sedat Peker, who followed the intra-establishment opposition and turned into their pole star, reached out to the Ministry of National Education with his latest statements.
Peker’s latest statements, which brought the Taşkesenlioğlu brothers and their relations to the public agenda, exhibited some of the examples of corruption in all its dimensions.
These statements, which started with Ali Fuat Taşkesenlioğlu, who went from Bank Asya to Halkbank General Directorate and from there to the top manager of the CMB, and continued with AKP Deputy Zehra Taşkesenlioğlu, are the words Nesrin (Taşkesenlioğlu) Kakırman, who is sitting in the seat of the Burdur Provincial Directorate of National Education of the Ministry of National Education. It was punctuated. It was this part of the job that interested us in terms of education.
DID MEB KNOW NESRIN KAKIRMAN?
According to the information in the official records, the personnel of the Ministry of National Education for 27 years. Nesrin Kakirman, In 19 years of this period, he worked as a manager at different levels. In the last eight years, that is, starting from 2014, he was appointed first as the Deputy Director of Istanbul Provincial National Education, and then as the Deputy Director of Ankara MEM.
Kakırman, who was subsequently placed in the seat of Beşiktaş District Directorate of National Education, was appointed to the positions of Eskişehir Provincial National Education and Burdur Provincial Directorate of National Education in 2022, respectively, by the MEB administrators or known circles who discovered the ore in him. Kakırman, who could stay on duty for about two months as Eskişehir MEM director, was taken from here and made Burdur Provincial Director of National Education.
Kakırman, who is still the Director of Burdur Provincial MEM, should regularly declare property as a civil servant. Because this is asked regularly from every civil servant. Alright; What percentage of civil servants and teachers make correct statements? Or, what percentage of the managers and bureaucrats at different levels of the MEB bureaucracy accurately declare the change in their own and their relatives’ assets?
IS NESRİN KAKIRMAN’S DECLARATION OF PROPERTY CORRECT?
“All“Did you say? Don’t make people laugh…”All”, or rather the majority, if and only if “Statement of the civil servant is essential and considered correct” is hidden behind the provision. Because the civil servant’s ability to lie is rejected from the beginning or an exception is accepted. Especially high bureaucrats…
If Nesrin Kakırman also hid behind this provision, despite being a teacher, an educator, and an education administrator, she made false statements in her property declarations, resorted to false statements and did not convey the changes in her assets correctly, if she concealed it, then of course, someone in the Ministry of National Education would not know the truth. However, this is an ethical, moral and legal issue. Of course, if you say who cares, ethics, morals and law, that’s different.
However, if Nesrin Kakırman made false statements in the declaration of property declarations, did not deliberately give false information, or in other words, did not use false statements, that is, if she conveyed the same thing, it is necessary to think that the MEB administrators, especially the bureaucrats of the General Directorate of Personnel, have correct information about Nesrin Kakırman. and must be accepted.
If this is the case, those who helped Nesrin Kakırman climb the managerial steps in MEMs and appointed her, until they handed over that she was also engaged in trade, in the words of Sedat Peker, on the warnings of those around her.MAYA Training and Consulting CompanyThey knew it was one of the owners of ”.
In this case, the question is: If the MEB managers and the bureaucrats of the General Directorate of Personnel knew about this situation, why, how and why did they make a company owner the Director of National Education? Which influential and authoritative persons played a role in this process? Who wanted Nesrin Kakırman to be the director of MEM?
MEB AND EDUCATION SHALL DOWN SUCH
Does anyone have the answers to the above questions? Even if he gives the answer, does it matter? I don’t know. Of course I know, but I don’t know. Because such works and transactions are just case-i work that has been going on in the MEB for years.
MoNE is an institution where some private school owners or managers are appointed to bureaucracy staff at jet speed from morning to evening. Likewise, those who do not have any necessary conditions are suddenly made the director of national education; those who appoint those whose acts of harassment have proven to be school principals and national education administrators are rewarded; It is also an institution where those who are found to be the owner of a series of luxury apartments and luxury cars while he was the director of national education in the investigations were promoted to the head of the department… Beware! Tender corruption, rent and armchair gangs, abuse of office and misconduct, etc.
Nesrin Kakırman is a simple conglomerate, perhaps just a grain of sand, in terms of the collapse of education and MEB. Probably, if Sedat Peker had not mentioned his name, he would have boiled away. He would stay on the sidelines with what he did in the corner and we wouldn’t even have a topic.
That’s why, aside from the agenda, it is not Nesrin Kakırman who is important. Because it is a small detail in the system. The most important thing is that in the spiral of social disintegration and cultural-moral decay, all institutions and organizations, from the legislature to the judiciary and the executive, deteriorate and turn into a poisonous swamp. Worse and worse among these, education and the Ministry of National Education have turned into an integral and essential element of this process.
TWO UNITS OF COLLAPSE IN MEB
Speaking of MEB, it should be noted: There are two basic units in education that carry out personnel selection, assignment and supervision, examination and investigation. One of them is the General Directorate of Personnel and the other is the Presidency of the Inspection Board…
Therefore, aside from determining the curriculum and content, the main and primary responsibility in the process of dismantling the education and MEB belongs to these two units and the bureaucrats who lead them. Especially in the last 20 years, all appointments, works and transactions made by the General Directorate of Personnel from these two units need to be questioned. It also includes all files opened and closed by the Board of Inspection.
I do not exaggerate! Think: “There is no one left uncontaminated by HaramPhotographs of a number of high MEB bureaucrats are published under the title ”. But no one is making a sound. There is not an iota of objection, not an iota of explanation. From the ‘Minister’ to the bureaucrat, everyone is silent…
Or with this silenceSilence comes from confessionIs the word ” reaffirmed from top to bottom? Of course, if the septic tank overflowed and its contents were scattered all over the place, both the question and its possible answer have long since become superfluous and out of date. The only thing left to do is to sweep the ball away…”
**He is a graduate of Ankara University, DTCF Department of Philosophy and is the author of the books “School of Desire”, “Love is Blue, Teacher”, “Teacher’s Brick on the Wall of Order”, “What Is Literature…”, “Allah Said Ustad-ı Azam”. Current and Intellectual; http://atalaygirgin.blogspot.com
.